I've been using the FTTH (Fiber to the Home) internet speed since 2004 when I was in Tokyo.
I moved to San Francisco in 2006 and used Comcast for just a few weeks and found that my apartment building has a better option, webpass that provides a shared FTTH 100 Mbps up/down and have been a happy customer since then.
Next week I'm moving to a new place, which is actually just a few blocks from the current place, but the place is not the lucky one that has webpass installed. I contacted webpass sales, and while my new landlord agrees to install the service, webpass claims that I need an approval from Home Owners Association at the new place that the majority of the tenants/owners would use it as a primary service, which might be possible but would take time.
So for now I signed up for sonic.net fusion. It's an ADSL 2+ service with unlimited landline voice, priced 20Mbps for $50. Not terrible, but it's a huge step down from FTTH that I've been spoiled for 7 years. I really wish sonic.net moves on to the fiber development soon, or that HOA approves webpass or Verizon FiOS coming to SF.
"20Mbps for $50" sounds not bad. But I'm curious on the actual bandwidth of 20Mbps DSL. :)
BTW I was paying 50 bucs for Verizon DSL 768kbps in 2005. That was horrible. At that time they already had 50Mbps DSL for 4000 yen or something in Tokyo. haha!
Posted by: Tadashi | 2010.11.09 at 01:35
I would thought that in Tokio you can connect to a fiber anywhere :S. I am curious about what is the percentage of inhabitants that can have 100 Mbps up/down?
Don't get me wrong, Japan is way ahead of the world in terms of internet bandwidth, but now I see it is not what I heard...
Anyway, great blog ;)
Posted by: Brutuscat | 2010.11.22 at 00:25
Brutuscat: I think you misunderstand: I live in San Francisco, not in Tokyo and that's why I can't get fiber. If you're in Japan you can get it everywhere even in the country side of the country.
Posted by: miyagawa | 2010.11.22 at 09:18